According to an article in ‘The New York Times’, during the pandemic, a heightened awareness of mortality seemingly led to more interest in signing up for cryopreservation procedures that can cost upwards of $200,000. What is concerning is our ever-persistent need to interfere with laws of nature and the circle of life. When every plant, animal, even a microorganism can gracefully accept when life has come to an end, does our intelligence leave us in denial of this basic truth?
There is also the question of the future we so fervently long for. The truth is, we have very little idea about what the world will look like after one hundred years. Could an individual from the 1800s have been able to survive coming back to life in 2022? How bewildered would they be by our cellphones, social media, superfast computers, digital money, cryptocurrency, limitless information? And beyond that, would they withstand the culture shock, our inexplicable linguistics, our hyper connected yet fragmented society? You know it would be nearly impossible. How do we expect to do better in an unseen future, when our present confounds us so?
Ultimately, cryonics falls in the category of things that seem like an affront to logic or beliefs, but could have us changing our tune due to innate human curiosity. For instance, if the prospect of life after death cost not 200,000 dollars but just 50 bucks, a lot more people would be willing to try it. It doesn’t matter if it works, you’re literally starting from dead here.
We could argue about the logical, scientific and ethical loopholes in cryonics from now till judgment day, but the truth is, if we don’t decide when another human dies, we perhaps don’t have a say in when a person chooses to be reborn.